Data
See data by gender below. Click "Visualize data" for a breakdown by gender and race/ethnicity, where applicable.
Child Care
| United States | 3-Year-Olds | 4-Year-Olds |
|---|---|---|
| Three and Four-Year-Olds Enrolled in Pre-School | 17% | 44% |
Sources: American Community Survey, 2023; Child Care Aware, 2023; National Institute for Early Education Research, 2023.
Single Householder
| United States | Single Female Headed | Single Male Headed | All Single Headed Households |
|---|---|---|---|
| Single-Headed Households in Poverty (100% Threshold) | 22.3% | 11.0% | 19.3% |
| Single-Headed Households in Poverty (200% Threshold) | 46.0% | 28.4% | 41.3% |
| Single-Headed Households with Children in Poverty (100% Threshold) | 33.5% | 15.4% | 29.9% |
| Single-Headed Households with Children in Poverty (200% Threshold) | 62.2% | 36.2% | 57.1% |
Data Source: American Community Survey, 2023.
Notes: Data shown for individuals aged 16+.
“Single householders” are male or female householders living in family households without a spouse present.
The Census uses the family’s size, number of related children, and age of the primary householder to determine the Federal Poverty Threshold.
Where no value is listed, the sample size is too small to compute an estimate. U = sample size is insufficient for the reported value to be representative of the population. Estimates should be interpreted with caution.
Work and Family
| United States | Women | Men | All |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parents of Young Children in the Labor Force | 71.3% | 94.4% | 81.9% |
| Part-Time Status of Workers with Young Children | 25.0% | 6.3% | 15.0% |
Source: American Community Survey, 2023.
Notes: Data shown for individuals aged 16+.
Labor force participation counts as either being employed or being unemployed but actively looking for a job. Part-time work is being employed but working less than 35 hours a week.
Policy
Updated January 26, 2026Current Policy Landscape
13 states have enacted paid family and medical leave (PFML) laws. These include California, Colorado, Delaware, the District of Columbia, Maine, Massachusetts, Maryland, Minnesota, New Jersey, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island, and Washington. Federal law does not guarantee paid leave to workers.
IWPR Recommendation
States should require comprehensive PFML to guarantee a minimum of 12 weeks paid leave for all workers, for a wide range of purposes. Paid leave laws should prioritize a broad and inclusive definition of family, a wage replacement rate that is high enough for workers to use the benefit, and critical job protections upon return to work.
Legislative Tracking: Current Sessions
arkansas
Session has adjourned
california
Enacted in a previous sessioncolorado
Enacted in a previous sessionconnecticut
Enacted in a previous sessionSession has adjourned
delaware
Enacted in a previous sessiondistrict-of-columbia
Enacted in a previous sessionhawaii
indiana
Introduced
Passed by 1 Chamber
Signed into Law
louisiana
Session has adjourned
maine
Enacted in a previous sessionmaryland
Enacted in a previous sessionmassachusetts
Enacted in a previous sessionminnesota
Enacted in a previous sessionSession has adjourned
montana
Session has adjourned
nevada
Session has adjourned
new-jersey
Enacted in a previous sessionnew-york
Enacted in a previous sessionnorth-carolina
north-dakota
Session has adjourned
ohio
Introduced
Passed by 1 Chamber
Signed into Law
oklahoma
oregon
Enacted in a previous sessionSession has adjourned
pennsylvania
Introduced
Passed by 1 Chamber
Signed into Law
rhode-island
Enacted in a previous sessiontennessee
Introduced
Passed by 1 Chamber
Signed into Law
texas
Session has adjourned
utah
Introduced
Passed by 1 Chamber
Signed into Law
virginia
Introduced
Passed by 1 Chamber
Signed into Law
washington
Enacted in a previous sessionIntroduced
Passed by 1 Chamber
Signed into Law
west-virginia
Introduced
Passed by 1 Chamber
Signed into Law
wyoming
Session has adjourned
Current Policy Landscape
16 states guarantee workers the right to paid sick time. These include Arizona, California, Colorado, Connecticut, the District of Columbia, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, and Washington. There is currently no federal right to paid sick leave for workers.
IWPR Recommendation
States should require paid sick leave policies that establish a right for all workers to earn paid sick time. Such policies should also include a guaranteed standard salary during leave and job protections upon return to work.
Legislative Tracking: Current Sessions
arizona
Enacted in a previous sessionarkansas
Session has adjourned
california
Enacted in a previous sessioncolorado
Enacted in a previous sessionconnecticut
Enacted in a previous sessionSession has adjourned
district-of-columbia
Enacted in a previous sessionillinois
Enacted in a previous sessionlouisiana
Session has adjourned
maryland
Enacted in a previous sessionmassachusetts
Enacted in a previous sessionmichigan
Enacted in a previous sessionminnesota
Enacted in a previous sessionSession has adjourned
mississippi
Introduced
Passed by 1 Chamber
Signed into Law
missouri
Enacted in a previous sessionIntroduced
Passed by 1 Chamber
Signed into Law
montana
Session has adjourned
nebraska
Introduced
Passed by 1 Chamber
Signed into Law
nevada
Session has adjourned
new-jersey
Enacted in a previous sessionnew-mexico
Enacted in a previous sessionnew-york
Enacted in a previous sessionnorth-carolina
north-dakota
Session has adjourned
oklahoma
Session has adjourned
oregon
Enacted in a previous sessionSession has adjourned
pennsylvania
Introduced
Passed by 1 Chamber
Signed into Law
rhode-island
Enacted in a previous sessiontexas
Session has adjourned
vermont
Enacted in a previous sessionwyoming
Session has adjourned
Current Policy Landscape
17 states and Washington, DC currently provide some families with a child tax credit in addition to the federal tax credit, though not all state’s child tax credits are refundable. These states include Arizona, California, Colorado, Idaho, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Oregon, Utah, and Vermont.
IWPR Recommendation
States should adopt child tax credits that are refundable and income-adjusted in accordance with a state’s cost of living. State and federal child tax credits are no substitute for broader investments in the care economy and policy solutions to make affordable care available for all families.
Legislative Tracking: Current Sessions
arkansas
Session has adjourned
california
Enacted in a previous sessioncolorado
Enacted in a previous sessionconnecticut
Session has adjourned
district-of-columbia
Enacted in a previous sessionidaho
Enacted in a previous sessionillinois
Enacted in a previous sessionindiana
Introduced
Passed by 1 Chamber
Signed into Law
louisiana
Session has adjourned
maine
Enacted in a previous sessionmaryland
Enacted in a previous sessionmassachusetts
Enacted in a previous sessionminnesota
Enacted in a previous sessionSession has adjourned
missouri
Introduced
Passed by 1 Chamber
Signed into Law
montana
Session has adjourned
nebraska
Introduced
Passed by 1 Chamber
Signed into Law
nevada
Session has adjourned
new-jersey
Enacted in a previous sessionIntroduced
Passed by 1 Chamber
Signed into Law
new-mexico
Enacted in a previous sessionnew-york
Enacted in a previous sessionnorth-carolina
Enacted in a previous sessionnorth-dakota
Enacted in a previous sessionSession has adjourned
oklahoma
Enacted in a previous sessionoregon
Enacted in a previous sessionSession has adjourned
south-carolina
Introduced
Passed by 1 Chamber
Signed into Law
texas
Session has adjourned
utah
Enacted in a previous sessionIntroduced
Passed by 1 Chamber
Signed into Law
vermont
Enacted in a previous sessionvirginia
Introduced
Passed by 1 Chamber
Signed into Law
wyoming
Session has adjourned
Data
See data by gender below. Click "Visualize data" for a breakdown by gender and race/ethnicity, where applicable.
Educational Attainment
| United States | Women | Men | All |
|---|---|---|---|
| Less than High School | 9.4% | 11.0% | 10.2% |
| High School Diploma or Equivalent | 24.5% | 27.4% | 25.9% |
| Some College or Associate’s Degree | 28.6% | 26.7% | 27.7% |
| Bachelor’s Degree | 22.4% | 21.3% | 21.8% |
| Graduate Degree | 15.2% | 13.6% | 14.4% |
Source: American Community Survey, 2023.
Notes: Data shown for individuals aged 25+.
Earnings by Educational Attainment
| United States | Less than HS | HS Diploma or Equivalent | Some College or Associate Degree | Bachelors Degree | Graduate Degree | All |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Women's Earnings by Educational Attainment (25+) | $32,000 | $39,500 | $46,000 | $67,000 | $85,000 | $55,000 |
| Men's Earnings by Educational Attainment (25+) | $42,000 | $50,000 | $60,000 | $90,000 | $120,000 | $67,000 |
| Gender Earnings Ratio by Educational Attainment (25+) | 76.2% | 79.0% | 76.7% | 74.4% | 70.8% | 82.1% |
Source: American Community Survey, 2023.
Notes: Data shown for individuals aged 25+. Earnings data are median annual values.
Where no value is listed, the sample size is too small to compute an estimate. U = sample size is insufficient for the reported value to be representative of the population. Estimates marked unreliable should be interpreted with caution.
Policy
Updated January 26, 2026Current Policy Landscape
35 states offer tuition-free community college to eligible students.
IWPR Recommendation
States should break down barriers to educational attainment and reduce soaring higher education costs by offering free community college—including tuition, fees, and books—for all residents.
Legislative Tracking: Current Sessions
arkansas
Enacted in a previous sessionSession has adjourned
california
Enacted in a previous sessioncolorado
Enacted in a previous sessionconnecticut
Enacted in a previous sessionSession has adjourned
delaware
Enacted in a previous sessiongeorgia
Enacted in a previous sessionhawaii
Enacted in a previous sessionillinois
Enacted in a previous sessionindiana
Enacted in a previous sessioniowa
Enacted in a previous sessionkansas
Enacted in a previous sessionkentucky
Enacted in a previous sessionlouisiana
Enacted in a previous sessionSession has adjourned
maine
Enacted in a previous sessionmaryland
Enacted in a previous sessionmassachusetts
Enacted in a previous sessionmichigan
Enacted in a previous sessionminnesota
Enacted in a previous sessionSession has adjourned
mississippi
Introduced
Passed by 1 Chamber
Signed into Law
missouri
Enacted in a previous sessionmontana
Enacted in a previous sessionSession has adjourned
nevada
Enacted in a previous sessionSession has adjourned
new-hampshire
Enacted in a previous sessionnew-jersey
Enacted in a previous sessionnew-mexico
Enacted in a previous sessionnew-york
Enacted in a previous sessionnorth-carolina
Enacted in a previous sessionSession has adjourned
north-dakota
Session has adjourned
oklahoma
Enacted in a previous sessionSession has adjourned
oregon
Enacted in a previous sessionSession has adjourned
rhode-island
Enacted in a previous sessionsouth-carolina
Enacted in a previous sessiontennessee
Enacted in a previous sessiontexas
Session has adjourned
vermont
Enacted in a previous sessionvirginia
Enacted in a previous sessionSession has adjourned
washington
Enacted in a previous sessionwest-virginia
Enacted in a previous sessionwyoming
Enacted in a previous sessionSession has adjourned
Current Policy Landscape
15 states have implemented protections for student loan borrowers. These include California, Colorado, Connecticut, the District of Columbia, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Nevada, New Jersey, New York, Rhode Island, Virginia, and Washington.
IWPR Recommendation
States should extend many of the same protections that already apply to mortgage and credit card borrowers to student loan borrowers. States should also safeguard students from exorbitant interest rates, unfair fees, and the loss of records or payments, among other predatory practices.
Legislative Tracking: Current Sessions
arkansas
Session has adjourned
california
Enacted in a previous sessioncolorado
Enacted in a previous sessionconnecticut
Enacted in a previous sessionSession has adjourned
district-of-columbia
Enacted in a previous sessionillinois
Enacted in a previous sessionlouisiana
Session has adjourned
maine
Enacted in a previous sessionmaryland
Enacted in a previous sessionmassachusetts
Enacted in a previous sessionminnesota
Enacted in a previous sessionSession has adjourned
montana
Session has adjourned
nevada
Enacted in a previous sessionSession has adjourned
new-jersey
Enacted in a previous sessionnew-york
Enacted in a previous sessionIntroduced
Passed by 1 Chamber
Signed into Law
north-carolina
Session has adjourned
north-dakota
Session has adjourned
oklahoma
Session has adjourned
oregon
Session has adjourned
rhode-island
Enacted in a previous sessiontexas
Session has adjourned
virginia
Enacted in a previous sessionwashington
Enacted in a previous sessionwyoming
Session has adjourned
Data
See data by gender below. Click "Visualize data" for a breakdown by gender and race/ethnicity, where applicable.
Earnings and Income
| United States | Women | Men | All | Earnings Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Workers' Earnings (16+) | $52,000 | $63,000 | $60,000 | 82.5% |
| Managerial and Professional Workers’ Earnings (16+) | $70,000 | $92,300 | $80,000 | 75.8% |
| Retirement Income (62+) | $13,000 | $20,000 | $16,000 | 65.0% |
| Social Security Income (62+) | $14,400 | $20,000 | $16,800 | 72.0% |
Source: American Community Survey, 2023.
Notes: Earnings/income data are median annual values.
Earnings by Educational Attainment
| United States | Less than HS | HS Diploma or Equivalent | Some College or Associate Degree | Bachelors Degree | Graduate Degree | All |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Women's Earnings by Education | $32,000 | $39,500 | $46,000 | $67,000 | $85,000 | $55,000 |
| Men's Earnings by Education | $42,000 | $50,000 | $60,000 | $90,000 | $120,000 | $67,000 |
| Gender Earnings Ratio by Education | 76.2% | 79.0% | 76.7% | 74.4% | 70.8% | 82.1% |
Source: American Community Survey, 2023.
Notes: Data shown for individuals aged 25+. Earnings/income data are median annual values.
Labor Force and Employment
| United States | Women | Men | All |
|---|---|---|---|
| Labor Force Participation | 59.3% | 68.2% | 63.7% |
| Part-Time Workers | 26.6% | 15.2% | 20.6% |
| Unemployment | 4.3% | 4.3% | 4.3% |
Source: American Community Survey, 2023.
Notes: Data shown for individuals aged 16+. Labor force participation counts as either being employed or being unemployed but actively looking for a job. Workers are classified as unemployed if they do not currently have a job, are looking for a job, and have not yet found one.
Living in Poverty
| United States | Women | Men | All |
|---|---|---|---|
| Adults in Poverty (18–64) | 11.2% | 8.7% | 10.0% |
| Seniors in Poverty (65+) | 12.1% | 9.1% | 10.7% |
| Working Poor (18+; 100% of Federal Poverty Threshold) | 4.2% | 3.1% | 3.6% |
| Working Poor (18+; 200% of Federal Poverty Threshold) | 14.5% | 12.6% | 13.5% |
Source: American Community Survey, 2023.
Notes: The working poor are defined as individuals who spend at least 27 weeks in a year working full-time and have incomes below the Federal Poverty Threshold. We calculate the share of workers who earn less than 100% and 200% of the Federal Poverty Threshold.
Occupational Grouping
| United States | Women | Men | All |
|---|---|---|---|
| Employment in Managerial and Professional Jobs | 47.8% | 38.9% | 43.1% |
| Self-Employed Workers | 8.1% | 11.6% | 9.9% |
Source: American Community Survey, 2023.
Notes: Data shown for individuals aged 16+.
Representation in STEM Jobs
| United States | Women | Men | All |
|---|---|---|---|
| Employment in STEM and STEM-related Jobs | 49.3% | 50.7% | |
| Employment in STEM Jobs | 26.6% | 73.4% | |
| Employment in STEM-related Jobs | 74.1% | 25.9% |
Source: American Community Survey, 2023.
Notes: Data shown for individuals aged 16+. For more information about the classification of STEM and STEM-related jobs, see related note in the State PAL methodology table.
The ‘All’ column may appear blank when the total equals 100%
Policy
Updated January 26, 2026Current Policy Landscape
13 states have enacted salary transparency laws: California, Colorado, Connecticut, the District of Columbia, Hawaii, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, Nevada, New Jersey, New York, Rhode Island, and Washington.
IWPR Recommendation
States should require employers to disclose salary ranges, hourly rates, bonus structures, and benefits for all job postings and promotions. These include remote jobs performed in the state.
Legislative Tracking: Current Sessions
arkansas
Session has adjourned
california
Enacted in a previous sessioncolorado
Enacted in a previous sessionconnecticut
Enacted in a previous sessionSession has adjourned
delaware
Enacted in a previous sessiondistrict-of-columbia
Enacted in a previous sessionhawaii
Enacted in a previous sessionillinois
Enacted in a previous sessionlouisiana
Session has adjourned
maryland
Enacted in a previous sessionmassachusetts
Enacted in a previous sessionmichigan
Enacted in a previous sessionminnesota
Session has adjourned
montana
Session has adjourned
nevada
Enacted in a previous sessionSession has adjourned
new-jersey
Enacted in a previous sessionIntroduced
Passed by 1 Chamber
Signed into Law
new-york
Enacted in a previous sessionnorth-carolina
Session has adjourned
north-dakota
Session has adjourned
oklahoma
Session has adjourned
oregon
Session has adjourned
rhode-island
Enacted in a previous sessiontexas
Session has adjourned
vermont
Enacted in a previous sessionvirginia
Introduced
Passed by 1 Chamber
Signed into Law
washington
Enacted in a previous sessionwyoming
Session has adjourned
Current Policy Landscape
18 states have enacted salary history bans.
IWPR Recommendation
States should prohibit all employers and hiring agencies from asking about an applicant’s prior compensation. All workers should be covered, regardless of full-time status.
Legislative Tracking: Current Sessions
alabama
Enacted in a previous sessionarkansas
Session has adjourned
california
Enacted in a previous sessioncolorado
Enacted in a previous sessionconnecticut
Enacted in a previous sessionSession has adjourned
delaware
Enacted in a previous sessiondistrict-of-columbia
Enacted in a previous sessionhawaii
Enacted in a previous sessionillinois
Enacted in a previous sessionlouisiana
Session has adjourned
maine
Enacted in a previous sessionmaryland
Enacted in a previous sessionmassachusetts
Enacted in a previous sessionminnesota
Session has adjourned
montana
Session has adjourned
nevada
Enacted in a previous sessionSession has adjourned
new-jersey
Enacted in a previous sessionnew-york
Enacted in a previous sessionnorth-carolina
Session has adjourned
north-dakota
Session has adjourned
oklahoma
Session has adjourned
oregon
Enacted in a previous sessionSession has adjourned
pennsylvania
Introduced
Passed by 1 Chamber
Signed into Law
rhode-island
Enacted in a previous sessiontexas
Session has adjourned
vermont
Enacted in a previous sessionvirginia
Introduced
Passed by 1 Chamber
Signed into Law
washington
Enacted in a previous sessionwyoming
Session has adjourned
Current Policy Landscape
31 states have raised their state’s minimum wage above the federal minimum, which has remained at $7.25 since 2009. Alabama, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, South Carolina, Tennessee, and Wyoming have either no minimum wage law or a minimum wage below the federal minimum; in these cases, the federal law applies.
IWPR Recommendation
States should raise the hourly minimum wage to at least $17 per hour and index for inflation. States’ minimum wage laws should also raise income limits for social safety net programs so that low-income workers remain eligible for benefits.
Legislative Tracking: Current Sessions
arizona
Enacted in a previous sessionIntroduced
Passed by 1 Chamber
Signed into Law
arkansas
Session has adjourned
california
Enacted in a previous sessioncolorado
Enacted in a previous sessionconnecticut
Enacted in a previous sessionSession has adjourned
delaware
Enacted in a previous sessiondistrict-of-columbia
Enacted in a previous sessionflorida
Enacted in a previous sessionhawaii
Enacted in a previous sessionIntroduced
Passed by 1 Chamber
Signed into Law
illinois
Enacted in a previous sessionlouisiana
Session has adjourned
maine
Enacted in a previous sessionmaryland
Enacted in a previous sessionmassachusetts
Enacted in a previous sessionmichigan
Enacted in a previous sessionminnesota
Session has adjourned
mississippi
missouri
Enacted in a previous sessionmontana
Session has adjourned
nebraska
Enacted in a previous sessionnevada
Session has adjourned
new-jersey
Enacted in a previous sessionnew-york
Enacted in a previous sessionnorth-carolina
north-dakota
Session has adjourned
oklahoma
Session has adjourned
oregon
Enacted in a previous sessionSession has adjourned
rhode-island
Enacted in a previous sessiontexas
Session has adjourned
washington
Enacted in a previous sessionIntroduced
Passed by 1 Chamber
Signed into Law
west-virginia
Enacted in a previous sessionwyoming
Session has adjourned
Current Policy Landscape
48 states have workplace antidiscrimination laws that prohibit discrimination on the basis of sex or gender. Alabama, Georgia, and Mississippi lack comprehensive workplace antidiscrimination protections for women.
IWPR Recommendation
States should implement strong workplace antidiscrimination laws to protect all workers against employer discrimination across a broad range of protected classes, including, but not limited to, sex, gender, sexual orientation, gender identity, race, ethnicity, religion, family or marital status, pregnancy status, age, or disability.
Legislative Tracking: Current Sessions
alaska
Enacted in a previous sessionarizona
Enacted in a previous sessionarkansas
Enacted in a previous sessionSession has adjourned
california
Enacted in a previous sessioncolorado
Enacted in a previous sessionconnecticut
Enacted in a previous sessionSession has adjourned
delaware
Enacted in a previous sessiondistrict-of-columbia
Enacted in a previous sessionflorida
Enacted in a previous sessionhawaii
Enacted in a previous sessionidaho
Enacted in a previous sessionillinois
Enacted in a previous sessionindiana
Enacted in a previous sessioniowa
Enacted in a previous sessionkansas
Enacted in a previous sessionkentucky
Enacted in a previous sessionlouisiana
Enacted in a previous sessionSession has adjourned
maine
Enacted in a previous sessionmaryland
Enacted in a previous sessionmassachusetts
Enacted in a previous sessionmichigan
Enacted in a previous sessionminnesota
Enacted in a previous sessionSession has adjourned
missouri
Enacted in a previous sessionmontana
Enacted in a previous sessionSession has adjourned
nebraska
Enacted in a previous sessionnevada
Enacted in a previous sessionSession has adjourned
new-hampshire
Enacted in a previous sessionnew-jersey
Enacted in a previous sessionIntroduced
Passed by 1 Chamber
Signed into Law
new-mexico
Enacted in a previous sessionnew-york
Enacted in a previous sessionnorth-carolina
Enacted in a previous sessionnorth-dakota
Enacted in a previous sessionSession has adjourned
ohio
Enacted in a previous sessionoklahoma
Enacted in a previous sessionSession has adjourned
oregon
Enacted in a previous sessionSession has adjourned
pennsylvania
Enacted in a previous sessionrhode-island
Enacted in a previous sessionsouth-carolina
Enacted in a previous sessionsouth-dakota
Enacted in a previous sessiontennessee
Enacted in a previous sessiontexas
Enacted in a previous sessionSession has adjourned
utah
Enacted in a previous sessionvermont
Enacted in a previous sessionvirginia
Enacted in a previous sessionwashington
Enacted in a previous sessionwest-virginia
Enacted in a previous sessionwisconsin
Enacted in a previous sessionwyoming
Enacted in a previous sessionSession has adjourned
Data
See data by gender below. Click "Visualize data" for a breakdown by gender and race/ethnicity, where applicable.
Health Insurance Coverage
| United States | Women | Men | All |
|---|---|---|---|
| Adults with Health Insurance (19–64) | 90.5% | 87.5% | 89.0% |
| Seniors with Health Insurance (65+) | 99.2% | 99.1% | 99.2% |
| Medicaid Coverage (19–64) | 18.6% | 14.2% | 16.4% |
| Medicaid Coverage Among Unemployed Adults (19–64) | 40.7% | 32.2% | 36.2% |
| Uninsured Adults (19–64) | 9.5% | 12.5% | 11.0% |
| Uninsured Adults of Reproductive Age (18–49) | 10.4% | 14.2% | 12.3% |
| Older Uninsured Adults (50–64) | 7.3% | 8.4% | 7.8% |
| Unemployed Adults who are Uninsured (19–64) | 19.0% | 27.1% | 23.2% |
| Adults Not in the Labor Force and Uninsured (19–64) | 13.5% | 14.2% | 13.8% |
Source: American Community Survey, 2023.
Notes: Workers are classified as unemployed if they do not currently have a job, are looking for a job, and have not yet found one. Workers are classified as being out of the labor force if they are neither employed nor unemployed.
Maternal and Newborn Health
| United States | Value |
|---|---|
| Fertility Rate (18–49; expressed per woman) | 1.61 |
| Adolescent Fertility Rate (15–19; expressed per 1000 population) | 13.08 |
| Cesarean Delivery | 32.31% |
| Preterm Births | 10.40% |
| Low Birthweight Births | 8.57% |
Source: Natality Records 2016-2023 on CDC WONDER Online Database.
Notes: Data are reported for 2023. Preterm is less than 37 weeks completed gestation. Low birthweight is less than 2,500 grams (5 pounds, 8 ounces).
Where no value is listed, the value does not meet the requirements for confidentiality constraints.
Maternal and Infant Mortality
| United States | Value |
|---|---|
| Number of Maternal Deaths | 4,295 |
| Maternal Mortality Rate (expressed per 100,000 live births) | 23.2 |
| Infant Mortality Rate (expressed per 1,000 live births) | 5.61 |
Sources: National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS), National Vital Statistics Center; Linked Birth/Infant Death Records 2017-2022 on CDC WONDER Online Database.
Notes: Data on maternal deaths and maternal mortality rates are reported for 2018–2022. Data on Infant mortality rates are reported for 2022.
Where no value is listed, the value does not meet the requirements for confidentiality constraints; U = these estimates do not meet the NCHS standard of reliability or precision.
Title X Family Planning Program
| United States | Women | Men |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Title X Family Planning Users | 2,338,208 | 416,727 |
| United States | Value |
|---|---|
| Number of Title X Facilities | 3,817 |
| Title X Funding | $286,500,000 |
Source: Office of Population Affairs, Department of Health and Human Services, 2024.
Notes: Data are reported for 2023.
Abortion
| United States | Cost |
|---|---|
| Self-Pay Cost of Medication Abortion | $563 |
| Self-Pay Cost of First Trimester Procedural Abortion | $650 |
| Self-Pay Cost of Second Trimester Procedural Abortion | $1,000 |
Source: Advancing New Standards in Reproductive Health, University of California San Francisco, 2024.
Notes: Data are reported for 2023. Self-pay cost is defined as paying for medical expenses without the use of health insurance.
No value listed indicates missing data; # indicates no facilities were providing these procedural abortion services; ~indicates no facilities were open and providing abortion services.
Policy
Updated January 26, 2026Current Policy Landscape
24 states have enshrined reproductive health care in statute or in the state constitution, though the scope of protected care, exceptions, and limitations vary by state. Since the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade, there is no federal right to abortion care.
IWPR Recommendation
States should guarantee individuals the right to reproductive freedom and bodily autonomy, covering a broad array of care, including, but not limited to, abortion, contraception, infertility treatment, and gender-affirming care. Access to reproductive freedom should not vary by zip code.
Legislative Tracking: Current Sessions
alaska
Enacted in a previous sessionarizona
Enacted in a previous sessionarkansas
Session has adjourned
california
Enacted in a previous sessioncolorado
Enacted in a previous sessionconnecticut
Enacted in a previous sessionSession has adjourned
delaware
Enacted in a previous sessiondistrict-of-columbia
Enacted in a previous sessionhawaii
Enacted in a previous sessionillinois
Enacted in a previous sessioniowa
Introduced
Passed by 1 Chamber
Signed into Law
kansas
Enacted in a previous sessionlouisiana
Session has adjourned
maine
Enacted in a previous sessionmaryland
Enacted in a previous sessionmassachusetts
Enacted in a previous sessionmichigan
Enacted in a previous sessionminnesota
Enacted in a previous sessionSession has adjourned
missouri
Enacted in a previous sessionmontana
Enacted in a previous sessionSession has adjourned
nevada
Enacted in a previous sessionSession has adjourned
new-jersey
Introduced
Passed by 1 Chamber
Signed into Law
new-york
Enacted in a previous sessionnorth-carolina
north-dakota
Session has adjourned
ohio
Enacted in a previous sessionoklahoma
Session has adjourned
oregon
Enacted in a previous sessionSession has adjourned
pennsylvania
Introduced
Passed by 1 Chamber
Signed into Law
rhode-island
Enacted in a previous sessiontexas
Session has adjourned
vermont
Enacted in a previous sessionwashington
Enacted in a previous sessionIntroduced
Passed by 1 Chamber
Signed into Law
west-virginia
Introduced
Passed by 1 Chamber
Signed into Law
wyoming
Session has adjourned
Current Policy Landscape
19 states have enacted interstate shield laws; some states have additional shield laws pertaining to telemedicine.
IWPR Recommendation
States should implement interstate shield laws to protect providers who offer a broad range of reproductive health care and gender-affirming care to patients who travel, or via telemedicine, from prosecution by other states enforcing their own restrictions.
Legislative Tracking: Current Sessions
arkansas
Session has adjourned
california
Enacted in a previous sessioncolorado
Enacted in a previous sessionconnecticut
Enacted in a previous sessionSession has adjourned
delaware
Enacted in a previous sessiondistrict-of-columbia
Enacted in a previous sessionhawaii
Enacted in a previous sessionillinois
Enacted in a previous sessionIntroduced
Passed by 1 Chamber
Signed into Law
louisiana
Session has adjourned
maine
Enacted in a previous sessionmaryland
Enacted in a previous sessionmassachusetts
Enacted in a previous sessionminnesota
Enacted in a previous sessionSession has adjourned
montana
Session has adjourned
nevada
Enacted in a previous sessionSession has adjourned
new-jersey
Enacted in a previous sessionnew-mexico
Enacted in a previous sessionnew-york
Enacted in a previous sessionIntroduced
Passed by 1 Chamber
Signed into Law
north-carolina
Session has adjourned
north-dakota
Session has adjourned
oklahoma
Session has adjourned
oregon
Enacted in a previous sessionSession has adjourned
rhode-island
Enacted in a previous sessiontexas
Session has adjourned
vermont
Enacted in a previous sessionwashington
Enacted in a previous sessionwyoming
Session has adjourned
Current Policy Landscape
5 states strengthened data privacy protections to prohibit geofencing within a certain radius of health care facilities, protecting patient and provider data. This includes Connecticut, Illinois, Nevada, New York, and Washington.
IWPR Recommendation
States should expressly prohibit geofencing near health care facilities and the sale of health care data to ensure the personal data of patients, providers, and helpers are not vulnerable to hostile entities.
Legislative Tracking: Current Sessions
arkansas
Session has adjourned
california
Enacted in a previous sessionconnecticut
Enacted in a previous sessionSession has adjourned
illinois
Enacted in a previous sessionlouisiana
Session has adjourned
massachusetts
michigan
Introduced
Passed by 1 Chamber
Signed into Law
minnesota
Session has adjourned
montana
Session has adjourned
nevada
Enacted in a previous sessionSession has adjourned
new-jersey
Introduced
Passed by 1 Chamber
Signed into Law
new-york
Enacted in a previous sessionnorth-carolina
Session has adjourned
north-dakota
Session has adjourned
oklahoma
Session has adjourned
oregon
Session has adjourned
rhode-island
Introduced
Passed by 1 Chamber
Signed into Law
texas
Session has adjourned
virginia
Enacted in a previous sessionwashington
Enacted in a previous sessionIntroduced
Passed by 1 Chamber
Signed into Law
wyoming
Session has adjourned
Current Policy Landscape
13 states require private insurers to cover abortion care. These include California, Colorado, Delaware, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New Jersey, New York, Oregon, Vermont, and Washington.
IWPR Recommendation
Insurers should not be decision-makers in patient care. States should require coverage for abortion care by private health insurers operating in the state.
Legislative Tracking: Current Sessions
arkansas
Session has adjourned
california
Enacted in a previous sessioncolorado
Enacted in a previous sessionconnecticut
Session has adjourned
delaware
Enacted in a previous sessionillinois
Enacted in a previous sessionlouisiana
Session has adjourned
maine
Enacted in a previous sessionmaryland
Enacted in a previous sessionmassachusetts
Enacted in a previous sessionminnesota
Enacted in a previous sessionSession has adjourned
montana
Session has adjourned
nevada
Session has adjourned
new-jersey
Enacted in a previous sessionnew-york
Enacted in a previous sessionnorth-carolina
Session has adjourned
north-dakota
Session has adjourned
oklahoma
Session has adjourned
oregon
Enacted in a previous sessionSession has adjourned
texas
Session has adjourned
vermont
Enacted in a previous sessionwashington
Enacted in a previous sessionIntroduced
Passed by 1 Chamber
Signed into Law
wyoming
Session has adjourned
Current Policy Landscape
25 states prohibit private insurers from refusing to cover transgender health care.
IWPR Recommendation
States should prohibit private insurance companies from discriminating against LGBTQIA+ patients and refusing coverage for care, and can further strengthen these protections with explicit requirements for coverage of a range of inclusive care.
Legislative Tracking: Current Sessions
arkansas
Session has adjourned
california
Enacted in a previous sessioncolorado
Enacted in a previous sessionconnecticut
Enacted in a previous sessionSession has adjourned
delaware
Enacted in a previous sessiondistrict-of-columbia
Enacted in a previous sessionflorida
Introduced
Passed by 1 Chamber
Signed into Law
hawaii
Enacted in a previous sessionillinois
Enacted in a previous sessionlouisiana
Session has adjourned
maine
Enacted in a previous sessionmaryland
Enacted in a previous sessionmassachusetts
Enacted in a previous sessionmichigan
Enacted in a previous sessionminnesota
Enacted in a previous sessionSession has adjourned
montana
Enacted in a previous sessionSession has adjourned
nevada
Enacted in a previous sessionSession has adjourned
new-hampshire
Enacted in a previous sessionnew-jersey
Enacted in a previous sessionnew-mexico
Enacted in a previous sessionnew-york
Enacted in a previous sessionnorth-carolina
Session has adjourned
north-dakota
Session has adjourned
oklahoma
Session has adjourned
oregon
Enacted in a previous sessionSession has adjourned
pennsylvania
Enacted in a previous sessionrhode-island
Enacted in a previous sessiontexas
Session has adjourned
vermont
Enacted in a previous sessionvirginia
Enacted in a previous sessionwashington
Enacted in a previous sessionIntroduced
Passed by 1 Chamber
Signed into Law
wisconsin
Enacted in a previous sessionwyoming
Session has adjourned
Current Policy Landscape
In 19 states, Medicaid programs include abortion care coverage with state funds. Federal policies, including the Hyde Amendment, prohibit the use of federal funds for abortion care in all states and territories, including the District of Columbia, where Congress wields unique jurisdiction.
IWPR Recommendation
States should expand Medicaid coverage to include abortion care to help patients overcome the undue financial burdens posed by federal restrictions. Everyone who needs an abortion should be able to get one.
Legislative Tracking: Current Sessions
alaska
Enacted in a previous sessionarkansas
Session has adjourned
california
Enacted in a previous sessionconnecticut
Enacted in a previous sessionSession has adjourned
delaware
Enacted in a previous sessionhawaii
Enacted in a previous sessionillinois
Enacted in a previous sessionlouisiana
Session has adjourned
maine
Enacted in a previous sessionmaryland
Enacted in a previous sessionmassachusetts
Enacted in a previous sessionminnesota
Enacted in a previous sessionSession has adjourned
montana
Enacted in a previous sessionSession has adjourned
nevada
Enacted in a previous sessionSession has adjourned
new-jersey
Enacted in a previous sessionnew-mexico
Enacted in a previous sessionnew-york
Enacted in a previous sessionnorth-carolina
Session has adjourned
north-dakota
Session has adjourned
oklahoma
Session has adjourned
oregon
Enacted in a previous sessionSession has adjourned
rhode-island
Enacted in a previous sessiontexas
Session has adjourned
vermont
Enacted in a previous sessionwashington
Enacted in a previous sessionwyoming
Session has adjourned
Current Policy Landscape
In 28 states, gender-affirming care is eligible for coverage under Medicaid.
IWPR Recommendation
States should expand Medicaid coverage to include gender-affirming care to expand access through affordability for patients for whom cost is a significant barrier. Everyone in need of gender-affirming care should be able to receive it.
Legislative Tracking: Current Sessions
alaska
Enacted in a previous sessionarkansas
Session has adjourned
california
Enacted in a previous sessioncolorado
Enacted in a previous sessionconnecticut
Enacted in a previous sessionSession has adjourned
delaware
Enacted in a previous sessiondistrict-of-columbia
Enacted in a previous sessiongeorgia
Enacted in a previous sessionillinois
Enacted in a previous sessioniowa
Enacted in a previous sessionlouisiana
Session has adjourned
maine
Enacted in a previous sessionmaryland
Enacted in a previous sessionmassachusetts
Enacted in a previous sessionmichigan
Enacted in a previous sessionminnesota
Enacted in a previous sessionSession has adjourned
montana
Enacted in a previous sessionSession has adjourned
nevada
Enacted in a previous sessionSession has adjourned
new-hampshire
Enacted in a previous sessionnew-jersey
Enacted in a previous sessionnew-mexico
Enacted in a previous sessionnew-york
Enacted in a previous sessionnorth-carolina
Session has adjourned
north-dakota
Enacted in a previous sessionSession has adjourned
oklahoma
Session has adjourned
oregon
Enacted in a previous sessionSession has adjourned
pennsylvania
Enacted in a previous sessionrhode-island
Enacted in a previous sessiontexas
Session has adjourned
vermont
Enacted in a previous sessionvirginia
Enacted in a previous sessionwashington
Enacted in a previous sessionwisconsin
Enacted in a previous sessionwyoming
Session has adjourned
Current Policy Landscape
49 states have extended Medicaid coverage to one year postpartum. Wisconsin extended coverage for 90 days postpartum. Only Arkansas has not extended Medicaid coverage for postpartum patients.
IWPR Recommendation
States should extend maternal health and postpartum coverage for all Medicaid recipients. Such extension is just one step states can take to reduce comorbidities and long-term health conditions and to address the broader maternal health crisis.
Legislative Tracking: Current Sessions
alabama
Enacted in a previous sessionalaska
Enacted in a previous sessionarizona
Enacted in a previous sessionarkansas
Session has adjourned
california
Enacted in a previous sessioncolorado
Enacted in a previous sessionconnecticut
Enacted in a previous sessionSession has adjourned
delaware
Enacted in a previous sessiondistrict-of-columbia
Enacted in a previous sessionflorida
Enacted in a previous sessiongeorgia
Enacted in a previous sessionhawaii
Enacted in a previous sessionidaho
Enacted in a previous sessionillinois
Enacted in a previous sessionindiana
Enacted in a previous sessioniowa
Enacted in a previous sessionkansas
Enacted in a previous sessionkentucky
Enacted in a previous sessionlouisiana
Enacted in a previous sessionSession has adjourned
maine
Enacted in a previous sessionmaryland
Enacted in a previous sessionmassachusetts
Enacted in a previous sessionmichigan
Enacted in a previous sessionminnesota
Enacted in a previous sessionSession has adjourned
mississippi
Enacted in a previous sessionmissouri
Enacted in a previous sessionmontana
Enacted in a previous sessionSession has adjourned
nebraska
Enacted in a previous sessionnevada
Enacted in a previous sessionSession has adjourned
new-hampshire
Enacted in a previous sessionnew-jersey
Enacted in a previous sessionnew-mexico
Enacted in a previous sessionnew-york
Enacted in a previous sessionnorth-carolina
Enacted in a previous sessionSession has adjourned
north-dakota
Enacted in a previous sessionSession has adjourned
ohio
Enacted in a previous sessionoklahoma
Enacted in a previous sessionSession has adjourned
oregon
Enacted in a previous sessionSession has adjourned
pennsylvania
Enacted in a previous sessionrhode-island
Enacted in a previous sessionsouth-carolina
Enacted in a previous sessionsouth-dakota
Enacted in a previous sessiontennessee
Enacted in a previous sessiontexas
Enacted in a previous sessionSession has adjourned
utah
Enacted in a previous sessionvermont
Enacted in a previous sessionvirginia
Enacted in a previous sessionwashington
Enacted in a previous sessionwest-virginia
Enacted in a previous sessionwyoming
Enacted in a previous sessionSession has adjourned
Current Policy Landscape
3 states have enacted fetal personhood laws: Alabama, Georgia, and Missouri. Litigation is frequently changing the legal landscape and the status of these laws.
IWPR Recommendation
States should reject fetal personhood laws, which are at direct odds with the hard-fought constitutional rights that protect women and pregnant people as individuals equal under federal law.
Legislative Tracking: Current Sessions
alabama
Enacted in a previous sessionarkansas
Session has adjourned
connecticut
Session has adjourned
georgia
Enacted in a previous sessionlouisiana
Session has adjourned
minnesota
Session has adjourned
missouri
Enacted in a previous sessionmontana
Session has adjourned
nevada
Session has adjourned
new-york
Introduced
Passed by 1 Chamber
Signed into Law
north-carolina
Session has adjourned
north-dakota
Session has adjourned
oklahoma
oregon
Session has adjourned
pennsylvania
Introduced
Passed by 1 Chamber
Signed into Law
texas
Session has adjourned
wyoming
Session has adjourned
Current Policy Landscape
IWPR Recommendation
States should not intervene in decisions made between a patient and their doctor, nor should they restrict patients’ freedom to seek care outside their state.
Legislative Tracking: Current Sessions
arkansas
Session has adjourned
connecticut
Session has adjourned
idaho
Enacted in a previous sessionlouisiana
Session has adjourned
minnesota
Session has adjourned
montana
Session has adjourned
nevada
Session has adjourned
north-carolina
Session has adjourned
north-dakota
Session has adjourned
oklahoma
Session has adjourned
oregon
Session has adjourned
tennessee
Enacted in a previous sessiontexas
Session has adjourned
wyoming
Session has adjourned
Current Policy Landscape
19 states have abortion bans, with 16 imposing near-total bans that allow exceptions only for rape, incest, life-threatening conditions, or only before most people even know they are pregnant. Litigation is frequently changing the legal landscape, and some of these bans may not currently be in effect.
IWPR Recommendation
States should reject abortion bans. Abortion is health care. Only patients and their doctors should make decisions about abortion care; states should never interfere.
Legislative Tracking: Current Sessions
alabama
Enacted in a previous sessionarkansas
Enacted in a previous sessionSession has adjourned
connecticut
Session has adjourned
florida
Enacted in a previous sessiongeorgia
Enacted in a previous sessionhawaii
Introduced
Passed by 1 Chamber
Signed into Law
idaho
Enacted in a previous sessionindiana
Enacted in a previous sessioniowa
Enacted in a previous sessionkentucky
Enacted in a previous sessionlouisiana
Enacted in a previous sessionSession has adjourned
maryland
Introduced
Passed by 1 Chamber
Signed into Law
massachusetts
Introduced
Passed by 1 Chamber
Signed into Law
minnesota
Session has adjourned
montana
Session has adjourned
nebraska
Enacted in a previous sessionnevada
Session has adjourned
north-carolina
Enacted in a previous sessionSession has adjourned
north-dakota
Session has adjourned
oklahoma
Enacted in a previous sessionoregon
Session has adjourned
pennsylvania
Introduced
Passed by 1 Chamber
Signed into Law
south-carolina
Enacted in a previous sessionsouth-dakota
Enacted in a previous sessiontennessee
Enacted in a previous sessiontexas
Enacted in a previous sessionSession has adjourned
utah
Enacted in a previous sessionwest-virginia
Enacted in a previous sessionwyoming
Enacted in a previous sessionSession has adjourned
Current Policy Landscape
27 states ban gender-affirming care up to age 18. Litigation is frequently changing the legal landscape, and some of these bans may not currently be in effect.
IWPR Recommendation
States should reject any ban on gender-affirming care. Gender-affirming care is health care, and decisions about treatment and care should remain exclusively between a patient and their doctor.
Legislative Tracking: Current Sessions
alabama
Enacted in a previous sessionarizona
Enacted in a previous sessionarkansas
Enacted in a previous sessionSession has adjourned
connecticut
Session has adjourned
florida
Enacted in a previous sessiongeorgia
Enacted in a previous sessionIntroduced
Passed by 1 Chamber
Signed into Law
idaho
Enacted in a previous sessionillinois
Introduced
Passed by 1 Chamber
Signed into Law
indiana
Enacted in a previous sessioniowa
Enacted in a previous sessionkansas
Enacted in a previous sessionkentucky
Enacted in a previous sessionlouisiana
Enacted in a previous sessionSession has adjourned
minnesota
Session has adjourned
mississippi
Enacted in a previous sessionmissouri
Enacted in a previous sessionmontana
Enacted in a previous sessionSession has adjourned
nebraska
Enacted in a previous sessionIntroduced
Passed by 1 Chamber
Signed into Law
nevada
Session has adjourned
new-hampshire
Enacted in a previous sessionnorth-carolina
Enacted in a previous sessionSession has adjourned
north-dakota
Enacted in a previous sessionSession has adjourned
ohio
Enacted in a previous sessionoklahoma
Enacted in a previous sessionoregon
Session has adjourned
south-carolina
Enacted in a previous sessionsouth-dakota
Enacted in a previous sessiontennessee
Enacted in a previous sessionIntroduced
Passed by 1 Chamber
Signed into Law
texas
Enacted in a previous sessionutah
Enacted in a previous sessionIntroduced
Passed by 1 Chamber
Signed into Law
virginia
Session has adjourned
washington
Introduced
Passed by 1 Chamber
Signed into Law
west-virginia
Enacted in a previous sessionIntroduced
Passed by 1 Chamber
Signed into Law
wisconsin
Introduced
Passed by 1 Chamber
Signed into Law
wyoming
Enacted in a previous sessionSession has adjourned
United States Key Facts
United States Female Population Breakdown
State policy or data requests?
Stakeholders and partners can get support from IWPR’s experts on state-specific data and policy landscape insights. Submit a hotline request to get started.
Hotline statepal@iwpr.org